Saving lives with fewer dollars
Planet Money
3 DAYS AGO
Saving lives with fewer dollars
Saving lives with fewer dollars

Planet Money
3 DAYS AGO
When a sudden withdrawal of foreign aid creates a life-threatening funding gap, one nonprofit is faced with a high-stakes decision: step in quickly or stick to rigorous standards. This is the story of how GiveWell navigated that dilemma in Cameroon.
Faced with a $1.9 million shortfall after USAID pulled funding, GiveWell evaluated whether to support ALIMA’s critical healthcare programs in conflict-affected Cameroon. Despite challenges in measuring impact—especially in unstable regions with mobile populations and spotty data—the team conducted a thorough cost-effectiveness analysis. They weighed interventions like syphilis testing against maternal mortality prevention, ultimately finding syphilis screening more efficient per dollar spent. While data limitations raised doubts, firsthand accounts from local health leaders confirmed the program's vital role. After balancing urgency with evidence, GiveWell approved the full grant to sustain essential services, marking a rare but necessary departure from their usual timeline to prevent immediate harm.
00:00
00:00
An estimated 620,000 people have died for lack of care due to USAID cuts
13:13
13:13
Evidence-based outcomes can be counterintuitive in funding decisions
16:13
16:13
Syphilis testing is more cost-effective than maternal mortality prevention
29:03
29:03
Direct confirmation from hospital director strengthens confidence in project impact