scripod.com

Is Trump's immigration bet working?

The federal government's aggressive immigration enforcement in Los Angeles has reignited a national debate over the balance between security, civil liberties, and state autonomy. As U.S. troops and National Guard units deploy in the city, local leaders push back against what they see as an overreach, while the administration frames the actions as fulfilling a core campaign promise.
Despite opposition from California’s governor and Los Angeles officials, the Trump administration continues high-profile workplace raids and military deployment to enforce immigration laws, citing public support and legal authority. While 54% of Americans approve of these deportation policies, incidents like the arrest of a pregnant U.S. citizen and separation of families have drawn sharp criticism. Conservative analyst Simon Hankinson defends the operations as lawful and necessary, especially when federal property or order is at risk. Though protests erupted, a curfew helped reduce clashes, with over 200 arrests. The administration appears focused on asserting federal authority, betting that public backing will outweigh backlash. The strategy reflects a broader effort to reshape immigration enforcement, even in sanctuary cities resistant to cooperation.