scripod.com

What happens when MAHA and public-health experts talk to one another?

In the wake of the pandemic, a growing number of Americans are questioning the institutions meant to protect their health. A new podcast dives into this crisis of confidence by creating space for unlikely dialogues—between vaccine-hesitant citizens and public health experts—revealing that trust is less about data and more about connection.
The podcast 'Why Should I Trust You?' uncovers how personal relationships and shared values can bridge deep divides in health beliefs. Rather than dismissing MAHA supporters as anti-science, the hosts highlight their genuine concerns and desire for transparency. Surprisingly, many within the movement aren't opposed to vaccines but seek inclusive conversations shaped by lived experience. Real progress emerges not from persuasion, but from listening—such as when MAHA members collaborate with doctors on nutrition reform or Medicaid access. The series reveals that scientific credibility alone isn’t enough; trust grows through peer networks, empathetic communication, and physicians who listen. Ultimately, rebuilding faith in public health means centering human connection over authority, curiosity over correction, and community input in shaping science-based policies.
06:31
06:31
Most MAHA supporters reflect broader national trends of vaccine hesitancy, not anti-vaccine extremism.
13:18
13:18
Even experts face vaccine hesitancy, showing the emotional complexity behind public health decisions.
22:30
22:30
Americans trust their personal doctors most for health information
22:48
22:48
Conversations can rebuild community trust in science and medicine